The Controversial Judge, By Dr RazaHaider, Under the domain of such reservation, America can not be placed as judge to trace and dig facts so to tag and blame ISI for any happening and untoward events being traced back in India or Afghanistan and else where as it’s a controversial judge to be placed on the designation for judgment .

Tags

Afghanistan, america, Asif ali zardari, constitution of pakistan, india, ISI, judges, judiciary, militancy, military, pakistan army, RAW

A judge is a person who look in to and observe, hear and listen, temporary halt and hold, call by intimation and authority, recites willfully or desirably or legislatively ,as per his capacity, being granted by virtue of his designation and authority, being dispensed by state, in the form of judgment , as part of his observation, evaluation ,interpretation and conclusion .

Under the portfolio of so many authentic and potentially expectation based criteria of assessment and eventual conclusion, there are many factors that are always disregarded by the parties as part and process of acceptance and willingness mutually.

These factors though logically have weight age in terms of human tendencies, but never become the part of discussion in vocabulary of relief as objection.

Such factors as objections, though are the resident and built-in traits of individual as desire, motive, dislikes, wrong interpretation, bias, segregation, negligence, incapacity, in appropriate command on subject, unfamiliarity as qualification and so on, and judges are no exemption, but nevertheless escape thoughts as acceptance of belief, in terms of willingness as part and parcel of law and Legislation, an authority, and designation as decision by the  judge, by the plaintiff and respondents.

A controversial judge is a person, who is observed by public at large in the contest of objection as bias, having hidden motive, in competency, racial, immoral and legitimate bearing as intimacy and so on.

Under the domain of such reservation, America can not be placed as judge to trace and dig facts so to tag and blame ISI for any happening and untoward events being traced back in India or Afghanistan  and else where as it’s a controversial judge to be placed on the designation for judgment .

Litigation is the easiest way to retaliate as action, at own desire.

If some one wants to fight someone easiest way is to, scold, blame, beat, and mess, indulge and puke.

You neither need evidence nor do you require proof so to declare, debar and dismantle.

Blame is the game of desire and hidden motive.

Tracing and tagging evidences in relation to ISI involvement by a controversial judge is a real bias attitude reflecting prepared and focused preformatted motive and can not be assimilated as such.

We as nation repeat again that we do not own Taliban and similar terrorist organization and we are trying our level best to terminate these menace that have put us on the slab of incarceration but blaming our forces and our integral shock absorber, the ISI, can not be own on dictated version of desire of America or India in particular, as lust.

Every body including America has full rights to design our fate as per their desire and thoughts but painting the same theme of design is a difficult process especially when it is a matter of survival, integrity and sovereignty as freedom and nation.

Every one shall under stand, its no more disregards to our statues of liberty, whether it be boundaries, people, arm forces or ISI.

At one side, Pakistani forces are entangled in difficult war with the Taliban, and on the other hand US is trying its hardest bid to implicate the ISI in the matters related to war on terror.