Today I received an email from top most management of my corporate to explain whether this “eponym as phrase” has controversy in terms of theme and definition or not.

  “WISDOM IS THE ABILITY TO SEE THINGS THE WAY NATURE SEES THINGS”

     In my opinion; this is a (False Eponym).

Here’s is my stance;

Wisdom is the ability to perceive things the way things have been structured as per their built-in architect, make and integral chemistry.

It is a mode as innate ability to observe predict, infer, interpret and conclude object in to subject; therefore in a manner that would delineate the perceptive object or a thing in its real impressive or expressive theme.

It is a cumulative phenomenon which resides on innate abilities of individual’s senses that cohesively interact and assess object in the way of its presentation and towards its structural make thus assessing unsighted information by its make and mirror and similarly deducing its function through the same.

This deducted informal information is interpreted again on logical condition as per circumstantial plateau of surround criteria; in to calculated presumptive say hence selecting individual in to the vocabularies term of wise as wisdom.

Wisdom is a continuous process of changing parameters on the basis of ever changing deduction hence creating miniature from the minute and million from the second.

This is to keep pace with conclusion from gain information though in a real sense this gain information is a prodromal aura or presumptive fallacy; since nature has a pack of concealed information within information arranged in a engorged bundle of ties which can not be concluded at one sight as wisdom or let me say even at the verge of human tendency.

Therefore the facts remains that wisdom is presumptive logical evaluated informal calculated misnomer that preludes individual ability to perceive thing as per its structural make and chemistry without solving the myth of concealed information.

Since concealed information of nature remains a mythical tale; under no means horizon and exhibition as sight of nature could match individual sight as vision or his perception for evaluation. (Dr Raza)