Do Taliban represent True Islam or not? Why can’t we prosecute them under Blasphemy law? A logical Inquisitive discussion based on query as questionnaire. By Dr RazaHaider; if Muslims are under the wrong or derange behavior or expressing wrongful representation as picture they must and should be put as traitor hence outright expelled as violators. “Either you are a Muslim as obligatory follower or you are out of Islam”. Follower means one who follows. We being “Muslim must pay attention to this word ‘follower’”.

It has been observed by many, rather more; as controversy  that if; Taliban do not represent true Islamic picture as practice; why this prerogative as grant to consider Taliban as Muslim is still,  within the concept of Islamic militants.

 

In other words if Islam has been macerated by their deliberate distortion; what factors are there that curtails their trial under the rule of blasphemy?

 

Once such debate became the part of inquisition on one of my article; by a person not with in the belief of Islam hence deliberated me to rectify his query.

 

Taliban’s do not represent Islam.

 

They claim their acts as Islamic.

 

Representation by definition explains authoritative grant of power of attorney where representative’s acts are representation of the authority for which these acts are carried out.

 

Since there is no such authoritative dispensing as grant hence under no means their or even my acts may be tagged as unanimous representation or symbol

 

Infact it’s again a claim.

 

There is a great difference between the two terms representation and claim, as phrase.

 

Representation expresses itself as right of demonstration whereas claim alleges representation as right.

 

I suppose I may not and shall not; route further explanation to these terms since, they are up to the level of theme understandable.

 

To the uttermost extent as discussion and to further elaborate my theme as explanation; I am of the opinion that differences of interpretation of the holy book and Sunnah especially towards practices and thereof its ultimate implications and further implementation, has resulted in to this controversy of right and righteous or representation as claim.

 

In my opinion it’s a difficult position and can not be under stood, but with a logic.

 

When you say you are a Christian, Hindu or a Muslim, it eventually explains practices and belief since, there are; a laid down procedural conviction or modes being a  follower, once one is  under the faith as principle of belief of that religion.

 

This belief as conviction under the rule of follower is always taken as baseline or fence of religion; thereby rejecting all concepts other than but the one; that is being sworn as belief.

 

A Muslim is declared Muslim when he accepts monotheistic concept as God (Same as in Christianity and Judaism) and a similar essential belief as declaration of (Muhammad SAWAW) as last prophet.

 

This is the basic conceptual symbol as obligation of Islam as essential belief and prerequisite, under the rule of religion being a Muslim.

 

By expressing these two obligatory principles as unanimous symbols, I have deliberately cordoned the discussion by unplugging variant contra lateral argument therefore to keep unanimously approved slogan with in the concept of belief as essentiality, in variant sects.

 

From here rules of practices have defined and declared visionary concepts of perception as interpretation.

 

Human by nature have ability and instinct to evaluate surrounds and around as per rule of interpretation.

 

This may be an observation, assumptions, prediction, inference, evaluation, experiments hence, invent as discovery, by any available means of interpretation putting it within the interpreted thought as version, postulates and theory.

 

This concept relies and ultimately procures law thus easing their way and consoling mind as future practice.

 

This rule of interpretation and its preliminary numerical steps applies where rules are laid down for future.

 

But if this theory as law is already a declared phenomenon as truth; in the format of open vocabularies concept as book (May it be bible or Qoran) and similar concept of practical version and virtual image of the book as prophet Mohammed (SAWAW), which is called Sunnah in Islam; logic demand and direct open discussion.

 

Open field as declared laws under such rules of logic; though remains the same but the rule of take as understanding, evaluation and therefore interpretation depends upon their own sources of obligations and indulgent as long as basic rules of book remains the same.

 

It is this point of debate where interpretation differs among the follower.

 

 Why is it so; you may call it an innate human tendency which always directs thought towards motivated desire to perceive things as per their interpretation.

This mode of interpretation always heightens when ever mind gets chance of open field free from obligation and compulsion of laid criteria.

 

It is here where understanding derives its essence as practice from grounds that are put as backups, grooming, tendencies, abilities and every such factor that may be dominant among the perceiver.

 

This perception and reception therefore to deduce as interpret can not be cordoned or confiscated or trialed, if rules of law has an extracted interpreted version as far as one keeps basic belief as legitimate.

 

Under the ethics of dictionary; procured idea of individual in terms of interpretation can not be tagged or put as representation hence symbol.

 

A Muslim is a representative of Islam.

 

A practitioner and follower by law, is suppose to follow rule.

 

A student reflects his grooming by exhibiting behavior hence representing his school, home and teacher.

 

Numerically declared as first represent his class similarly class representing or standing first represents school among schools.

 

This is a general formula of logic.

 

Any person abrogating laid down law as rule is considered as traitor

 

Principle of belief and similar criterion based representation and reflections, if at all are breached; violate ethical laws of corporate, organization, states or religion hence putting individual in terms of explanation for violation.

 

Where as restricted, compulsive, obligatory rules as authority, that are put as prerequisite  laws as compulsion; are the basis of any unit as governance and therefore defaulters are treated as violators hence out right termination.

 

As such if Muslims are under the wrong or derange behavior or expressing wrongful representation as picture they must and should be put as traitor hence outright expelled as violators.

 

“Either you are Muslim as obligatory follower or you are out of Islam”

 

Follower means one who follows.

 

We being “Muslim must pay attention to this word ‘follower’”.

 

 

 

As far as blasphemy and similar rules as law should be applied to these Taliban; it is again a subject that demands logical crossover which resides on belief of the two basic laws for being a Muslim.

 

Since these Taliban are within the declared acceptance of belief as prerequisite which necessitate being Muslim; they are being spared.

 

 Though! My personal view is any one violating the true image of this basic assumption as law; should be liable and trialed since ‘its not just rules as law that is to be followed but; practices remains the image of real picture’.

 

One more thing that needs to be understood is the punishment as jurisprudence in Islamic perspective.

 

Without controversially litigating shariah as law or jurisprudence under principle of belief of Islam; there should be one general understanding for all; May it be Muslim or otherwise that; ‘all laws and their punishment in Islam, as been laid down as criterion; is a definite part of acceptance but prosecution under such acts is again a necessary part of religion.’

 

Under this belief awarder and awardee have prerequisites that must fulfill as compulsion before dispensing punishment in its real format.

 

It is not like that any dick, Harry, and wijhay or salaam would stand and award punishment without fulfilling strict criteria of such awards.

 

This is a similar obligation as prerequisite of Islam and in my opinion Taliban’s have distorted this image of Islam by setting it aside or breaching the real path of truth as compulsory obligation therefore exploiting real picture of Islam.

 

This criterion to dispense punishment in real theme of format has strict compliance as pious, obedience and truthful practitioner and under the protocol of prerogatives as Islamic state based on scholastic attitude of clerical acceptance as scholar; which these Taliban’s are not even up to the mark or entry qualifier.

 

In my opinion sanctioned punishments as Islamic laws indicate severity of crime with respect to intensity of penalty.

 

Punishments are mode to herald crime and intensity of punishment reflects graveness of the issue.

 

Murder is an offence that awards death penalty if proven though, legislations and implementations in different countries and religion have different protocols as practice depending upon their rules as laws.

 

Under the rule, every acts of Taliban are against the concept of Islamic law and practice since they do not comply or imply basics and compulsive obligatory essentials of prerequisite.

 

But since they are within the basic belief as Muslim they can not be trialed under rule of general consensus among few sects of Islam.

 

 I repeat few sects of Islam

 

Though in my personal opinion! I disregard and discard their practice and attitude; endorsing it as, against Islam and Islamic concept of peace and humble treat and hence ready to treat them under the rule of yen as blasphemy.