Islamic jurisprudence and shameless Taliban’s, BY Dr RazaHaider, If at all one is not under the rule of reign as religion; under no means issue as controversy is acceptable since; we have a defined domain as practice and are applicable only to those within the confiscated realm of belief of religion as Islam.

Criticism against practices and beliefs has right now become the day to day grievance among different school of thoughts as sects and religions; especially the media and anchors in west at large.

 

Perceiving and discussing different rules as discipline is now the subject as comparison hence; to put in to topic as rift; the religious regulation as jurisprudence; thereby tagging and dishonoring the faith of individual in to malicious themes and intents.

 

Here the most targeted and humiliated among the visuals is the principality of belief as practices of Muslims and Islam in terms of law as punishment hence Shariah as jurisprudence, at large.

 

Why it is so; is an extended visionary concept as intended scope reflecting; enmity hence built in rift  against this religion; but concisely and at other perspective; current derangements and increase in fidelity of fundamentalism as fanaticism; is the basic cause which has illegitimately introduced this chapter of controversy as conflict; in to conversation of unwanted displeasure.

 

Every time we see Islam remains the topic of interest among non Muslims and similar practices of Muslims in lieu as religious laws as jurisprudence; remains the favorite topic of discussion.

 

Astonishingly! Though this interest is never a catching point as attraction in favor of intended acceptance as knowledge but in fervor; as an attitude that clearly reflects repellant taunt as behavior so to; swiftly carry discussion to scope of built-in conduct as stance.

 

This is to malice in middle of discussion hence tagging it a secluded religion with unethical practices.

 

Most controversial aspect as litigation hence favorites are basics Shariat law and criminal punishment hence Islamic jurisprudence thereof; few specific punishments as suggested by this religion in lieu of criminal offence.

 

Although such implementations as legislative cordoned punishment is a subject that prelude only with reference to belief within cordoned Islamic ideology and is only applicable when faith as Islam been accepted as religion hence oblige; but still people as non believers; do not let any moment that may drag Islamic jurisprudence hence to whip and thrash by any means; these issues as laws.

 

Although this targeting of ultimate rule of religious law as jurisprudence is based on assumption and presumptions but nevertheless a great share of victimization is the result of consequential lack of knowledge of our own clerics hence people due to whom this target becomes an easy goat by these stake holders.

 

First of all one should clearly understand that these rules as regulation hence practices as jurisprudence and law; are the laid down instructions as obligation of religion if at all you accept the same by entering within the domain of that religion.

 

If at all one is not under the rule of reign as religion; under no means issue as controversy is acceptable since; we have a defined domain as practice and are applicable only to those within the confiscated realm of belief of religion as Islam.

 

Once you enter and accept the version of belief as truth than; it’s the matter of oblige.

 

 

We are not bound to obey public and globe for and similarly answerable to world for our belief as practice; may it be Shariah or whatever.

 

We follow and practice what is being essentially within our religion and as dictated by our legitimate books as belief.

 

A Christian is expected to follow instruction as laid down in bible, whereas Buddhist as per his book of belief and god.

 

Shariah is not at all a new concept among Muslim only.

 

The same concept as law exists in almost all religion in this universe.

 

Similar jurisprudence in Hinduism is known as Dharmaśāstra. (Wikipedia)

 

Shariah is the way of desired practice as has been laid down and as per book and messenger (PBUM).

 

It’s a methodology of criteria to live, lure and lane your direction.

 

It’s a; a selective way to pursue and cordon life at will and as desired by your religion.

 

Shariah is like your law of state as obligation that sanctions responsibility to abide as long as you stay within the premise.

 

Shariah is like your necessity that is a prerequisite; in an institution as mandatory; before or when you enter within its premises.

 

It is a compulsive binding as obligation to obey and abide like rules and regulation as long as one remains within the dominancy.

 

Shariah is the way to solve and secure conflict and rift hence to award and reward punishment as per its own built-in criteria of justice as essentiality.

 

It’s the way of lawful implementation of verdict as order; therefore to regulate society hence life and living; thereby; cordoning all within the visionary scope of ethical belief.

 

Such rule and regulation are almost part of every religion with similar and same scope; though different contextual manner as punishment as means of obligation.

 

Offensive crimes are heinous behavior among and within almost any religion and punishment with respect to different horizons as belief are different hence ethical but constrained by the stranded belief of religion and among all those within the dominancy of respective faith.

 

Similarly practices and obligations as offerings have different visionary belief of perception; hence implementation as living and respect; and under no means criticism by faithful of other religion can be a subject as right or wrong.

 

Human nature has different tendencies of perception hence preempting things as per their sense of appreciation depending upon their own vision, weightage, understanding and hence interpreting according to their need as living.

 

It is this fact that different norms as rules and services as regulation are put as part of consenting hence obliging and regarding standard operative procedures; when it is within their belief as faith.

 

It is this consent that took and takes the position of rules of Shariah in Islam or methodology as jurisprudence or Dharmaśāstra in Hinduism that becomes the mutual obligation as order of a religion who ever stay as follower.

 

Coming toward this intense new wave of extreme of counter and coup stratagem as grievance and thereof  humiliation;  my personnel feel as interpretation revolves around this increase attitude of Muslim fundamentalist who have indulged almost any thing within and without under the umbrella of constrained attitude of self perceived religion of truth as order in the name of Shariah..

 

Without going in to definition and hence; different perspective prosecution under different umbrellas of definition as sect; the legal implementation of Shariah and thereof its subsequent punishment; as per Islamic jurisprudence as law: is above and almost a different theme of subject; that has adversely affected this lawful truth of Shariah; in to criticism.

 

Award of punishment as per Shariah is a strictly regulated procedural dynasty that can not and never be breached and short cut as slash.

 

However current pleasure as award of displeasure; in lieu of confiscated grant of trial as punishment;  the awarder is not at all the state and the awardee is always seen in agony on behalf of brutal maul treatment; without curtailed criteria of Shariah as law.

 

This macerating picture of award as punishment through the hands of people who are neither state nor clerics of unanimous profile but all time controversial miscreants as rhetoric endemic uneducated tribal trouble maker; who play this game of Shariah and jurisprudence hence litigating it like offence; is the main cause of criticism that has tuned this Shariah law in to controversy among globe.

 

It is this attitude as behavior that has distorted the image of basic and mandatory rule of faith in to international controversy hence dismantling Islamic image of practice as secluded and irrational.

 

Among such goons and thugs Taliban’s are the people who have in a real sense distorted the image of Islam to the best of their tendency as enemy.

 

These manic! Have infact persuaded like ravishers hence dismantling original vocabulary of Shariah in to new theme of massacring and maneuvering law hence distracting the image of Islam and its ethical law in to fate of hazard.

 

Here is the reason why this issue of jurisprudence is under jeer of jury among people who though are themselves unaware of the law but; do not let one single deviant approach; to let escape but to put the same in to the dictionary of Islam as controversy.

 

I think this is time that Muslims scholars as clerics must and shall unanimously declare these deviant Taliban’s as non Muslims hence to participate in real jihad to safe Islam, Muslim and Pakistan from these unashamed Taliban’s.