History is a static, acute or gradual, onset of detailed eventful event culminating in to disaster or success.

It is an impactful and endorsing, happening that remain as icon in the society culminating and creating an essence of insignia and slogan to follow by future generation to come.

If a perceive lawyer movement in above mention criteria and definition of history, I would definitely have to indulge my self in self sighted questionnaire that, is it an impact full happening?

In order to emboss or create impact one has to shatter and strike with a force that may create its impression.

Creation of image and embossed impression require a forceful thrust enough to disassemble the attracting and adhesing forces.

Do we really think that the movement was powerful enough to disassemble such coalition retaliating forces?

In my opinion distraction and disbursement so to shatter and disassemble the required desired goal resides on cumulative, linear directional magnitude of similar thoughts and thinking mechanics.

Such accumulation and joint venture of thoughts floats on the plat form of same reservations and suffering in relation to the contest.

It is this cumulative and collective doubts that tremor the resistance and breach the binding resisting forces.

 Continuation of such tremor and jolty waves create embezzlement among the resister thus expressing the magnitude in the form and shape of revolution.

  A revolution stands on the platform of honoring lives with blood.

 Sacrifices in the shape of loss lives, blood, belongings is the only feed that flare the revolution so to create and ignite the issue and desired motive .

Sacrifice is a lust that is above every domain of boundaries, affiliation and love.

 People with political belongings have neither such guts nor such valor to stand motiveless and regardless of incentives.

Systems are created by designing and organizing institutions.

Personalities do play role to enhance and uplift the institution but does not restrict reforms and rehabilitation in the absence.

System is nothing but an organized way of managing things.

It is usually defined so to run organizations and institutions in a manner feasible to the runners and with a motive to implement, without element of annoyance and unforeseen event with effective thrust, minimizing any hindrance ,whatsoever ,being produced if at all .

Derangement in a smooth and effective system does not depend on individual for its rectification but it is the structural anatomy that curtails by virtue of its architectural designs, any such forces that may disrupt its existence in uniformity.

In addition to such strict structural architecture reinforcement, element such as qualification, background, merit, check and balances, and reputation are the key factors that are important in maintaining the credibility and essence of system.

Presence or absence of a person from the site and sights of such systemized institute never terminate in to turmoil of the institution.

In order to facilitate such authoritative systemized structure long term checks and balances, with intense scrutinizing built in tendency of system is required.

Now if I consider the present structural architecture of judicature as a system, the final authoritative prerogative to redesign and reformulate, still lies in the hands of those that are qualified enough as culprits with no credibility or worth

Under such circumstances of illegitimate and incredible awarding and granting authorities, a change directed on the basis of saving system and institution is a misnomer .

It’s the system that is authoritative by virtue of its implementing power of the state.

Change the system and not the personalities.