Sigma is a perception based methodology, usually designed and formulated, so to over cum different field related difficulties, thereby curtailing the subject thus minimizing the risk factor and maximizing the out put without undergoing derangement at ascertained calculated assumptions.

This is not a definite version of definition but my self interpreted opinion of term.

Similarly, in our day to day upcoming engagements, say on the start of a hectic day, we evaluate things accordingly and as per urgency, preference, priority and liabilities, so that we may effectively culminate the required task by our own self designing, keeping the objectives within the said domains of above mentioned term.

If I evaluate version of lawyer movement and civil society and interpret with above cited definition as opinion, I have no hesitation to disagree, on the level of perception of interpreting the issue as most urgent, preferred and demanding urgency.

System is an organized way of managing things.

 It is usually defined so to run organizations and institutions in a manner feasible to the runners and with a motive to implement, without element of annoyance and unforeseen event with effective thrust, minimizing any hindrance ,whatsoever ,being produced if at all ,as in this case ,PCO and respective extortionist general Musharraf.

Derangement in a smooth and effective system does not depend on individual for its rectification but it is the structural anatomy that curtails by virtue of its architectural designs, any such forces that may disrupt its existence in uniformity.

In addition to such strict structural architecture reinforcement, element such as qualification, background, merit, check and balances, and reputation are the key factors that are important in maintaining the credibility and essence of system.

Presence or absence of a person from the site and sights of such systemized institute never terminate in to turmoil of the institution.

In order to facilitate such authoritative systemized structure long term checks and balances, with intense scrutinizing built in tendency of system is required.

It is not that Mr. so and so will come and curtail as if he is the only field related expert.

In my opinion, if Mr. Iftikhar is that much credible and respected and important then the person may be put up for presidency appointment.

Please I have no reservation to the justice but the term has been used to float as an idea.

Now if I consider the present structural architecture of judicature as a system, the final authoritative prerogative to redesign and reformulate, still lies in the hands of those that are qualified enough as culprits with no credibility or worth i.e. from Mr. Musharraf to Farooq naik and who so ever.

Under such circumstances of illegitimate and incredible awarding and granting authorities, a change directed on the basis of saving system and institution is a misnomer and is only directed towards ego, prestige and one man show which is nothing but a piece of well wishes as forecast, with no future prospects, since Iftikhar is not the only judge that is a sole authority and qualifier for future.

It’s the system that is authoritative by virtue of its implementing power of the state.

 In my opinion ,this subject of urgency ,priority ,preference ,liability ,obligations ,long term benefit and merit ,should now get entrance as the main mass of desire and not directed on individuals EGO .

Basic issues are basic issues which demand urgent relief .nothing can be compromised on the theme of basic issues.