The Insane Pakistani Spectators and Brainy Media, By Dr RazaHaider, Is he that much, as if president name can be used for abuse but Mr. Sharif uddin name could not be made public, as constitutional crime?

Pakistani media, working again at its all time habitual tendency, as multidimensional activist distorting the facts, figures and shape, thus probing and disbursing unrelated, ill threatening issues as flag bearer of righteous school of thoughts.

Similar questionnaire of motive based subject is again in run and conductivity without the element and essence of ground realities and circumstantial evidences.

Questionnaire based ideas to express, and engage public away from ground realities and provoking and endorsing their thoughts, so to halt thinking mechanics by exciting question has again been made the syllabi of journalism.

Instead of dealing the issues responsibly by exposing the truth, diversion of discussion has become the habitat so to cultivate medium of instruction, in the form of version of media.

Stress and strains has strenuously been introduced as new modification and upgrading and discussion with the false perception of thoughts has been virtually promoted.

Why is it that presents constitutional position, with reference to the judiciary has not been cleared to the population at large, by such constitutional experts and interpreter of different reliable cadre that has no affiliation with any political force?

Why is it that only people with standing slogans and move holders are only being called to get multiple opinions ,as Mr. Zardari, nawaz sharif, aitazaz ahsan etc, whereas personalities ,like fakruddin g ibrahim ,Abdul Hafez lakhoo , justice nasir aslam zahid ,and the so called father of constitutional amendments  Mr. sharif uddin pirzada, gets escape from the eyes.

Why cant Mr. Kamran khan, and shahid masood and hamid mir, are unable to get the same extortionist on the table of interview as capital talk, meray mutabiq, and kamran khan show.

What is the point of inattentiveness, deliberate relief, with regard to subject lawyer?

Is he not accessible, or is there any some kind of inborn fear?

Why his name is never been utilized on the plat form of so called free media, that teaches and shouts as most righteous and flag holder as the voice of people?

Why is he never been called to explain his lapses on the part of nation?

Is he that much, as if president name can be used for abuse but Mr. Sharif uddin name could not be made public, as constitutional crime?

This is the point of my conversation and idea.

Media is exaggerating and disbursing false and unrealistic picture so to derange the thinking mechanism of the nation.

                      Media should plays a vital role in all day to day activities what so ever and where ever whether personal issues or related to any affecting or reflecting public or government matters and of course forecasting, internal and external issues. It is appreciating that present trend and policies of media, to aware people with regard to ever changing scenario and to exercise true picture among people, has in reality changed the concept and belief, specially, in country like our, and has in turn, gave media, a reputable position qualifying and maintaining its integrity and worth, as a spokesman of people of Pakistan.  But this award ,as a spokesman should not be in a manner that can create problems and soreness within the community  or its direction should not be linear and constrained .Well its only my  opinion and  I think , the role of media should be  to educate people and quantify their queries with regard to expected or suspected outcome .Why is it ,that gradually ,media is taking it self as a, conveyer and translator to what has been dictated or said, in a speech  .I repeat , its my feel ,after having a continuous watch on television ,newspaper and other network as well ,like news ,tubs ray, talks shows ,letter to the editor  and etceteras.     

              

  I think media should understand that it is their duty to convey any thing on air with contest to any one, in an interpreted and integrated form rather to quote the phrases in a manner that has been delivered or quoted. By this , I do not mean that it should not quote the original speech or truth but it is their duty that they should realize the facts that 90% of population are under qualified , ill educated/ illiterates and are dependent on medias attitude and way of   expression and of course medias assessment regarding the issue. Simply reporting a matter on air without realizing future upcoming impact and without foreseeing resultant outcome can be very exciting to the critics and town tale tellers but this truth can create a fatal outcome in a community which can be more drastic and eventful and it should be the priority and professional liability of such an important constituent and perhaps pillar, of nation.

Well we can understand the craze to excel and become the first to report in situations but this craze should always precede your national priorities and your ethical turnout .It is true, that majority do plays a role in exercising the marketing of subject channel but countries are monitored and governed by intellects, and media should realize that this negative or potentially vacant role, is duly recognized and marked out by these intellects and think tanks.

 

   I think media should quantitatively and qualitatively assess itself to chalk out their exact role with reference to the community and its importance, as I have mentioned above, in managing the social religious political and administrative capacities and issues.

                  It is very exciting and entertaining, to see people sitting together in a show, with different related and known personalities and putting questionnaire and getting out some sweet and sour reservations from them. But, is it something which comes under the heading of entertainment or Gupshup or Umer Sharif Show?

Is it a part of inquiry being held, and the question being put, are from the president of the inquiry committee? What else can we get from it, if we know that “Who was in Laal masjid, why agreement could not be fulfilled why Molvi rasheed could not give up and abandoned? Is government right or wrong?

               Do media really think, to chalk or dig out issues? do they really think that it is right time to dig out assumption based stories and float it in public or they just want people to discuss the issue with their reference, that it was being first pointed out and floated on air by XYZ channel for the first time so that they may be credited with generous rewards, as top most? 

 With due regards, I in my personnel capacity assure them, they are the topmost channels and I adore them in my personal capacity. There is no doubt about their topmost position.

                      But ,with their such a tremendous and important ranking ,they ought to equalize rather prefix the same share of responsibility in a more mature and protective manner  and help  resolve the situations by briefs and interpretation and in a intellect way, and  not just ,by calling and floating interviews of persons with no standing and restricted and constipated /narrowed views, but by introducing intelligent ,worthy ,responsible ,well educated and experts in field, to  execute and manage disturb and emotional  community.                   

We should stop criticizing on the issues and should established future blueprints to get our self far away from what has been done today.  I again emphasis that more of the population in Pakistan is illiterate and emotional and it wont be justified if media could not

Let these activities to be monitored the way, which are served as specialist in the subject. Criticism is necessary but positive criticism is always appreciated. Forget about what happened in 70; s, there is another generation ready to quote the same event in new dimensions tagging us a failure as we are squeezing and vindicating our predecessors with remarks.

This is the property given to us by our ancestors and we ought to look after and stabilize it by all means.