Dr RazaHaider

Recently a Bangladeshi Supreme court restricted, banned and curtailed all political parties within the state; that use as misuse the Islamic slogan of faith and Islam for reimbursement of achievement as reign and domain as political stand.

Here is my stance over the issue;

This is a practical decision and perfectly ordered; matching the requirement of time and century.

To me! Religion is one cofactor that creates emotional instability in follower making follower a catalyst to ignite and provoke therefore to drag him in war that can only be fought with emotions and sentiment.

Though this tendency of retaliation is not at all a sole factor within the rule of trend yet; the after effects in lieu and due to this factor; has global effects and are perceived within the conventional conflicts between religions.

My point is if you die for your religion; non believers would see you as threat and your action would be in terms of scarcity and constrained outlook and impression but; if you die for a cause and for your country or similar issue in spite within the religious domain as Muslim; your religion would remain safe in terms of controversy.

Actually this theory as my opinion has no restricted terms as constrained thinking within the contest of perhaps religion as wrong element but; in fact it is the convey and delivery of message you may say interpretation by goony scholars within the tope of Concepts; that are in actual the reason of disaster; therefore floated as misuse hence to ignite and regain calculated stunt as benefits by preachers through the followers.

It is here where the need for restriction pleads its way to shutter such factors that may become reason between human as conflict and thereof partiality, may it be religion.

There are more than many calibrated schools of thought among one single religion as Islam.

 No single school matches terms as condition that can satisfactorily be own and be considered worthy within the eyes of variant as legitimate.

Thus each claiming and fortifying their thought as legitimated and as insignia.

Precisely; and logically religion and politics has no different provision of expenditure in reality.

In fact this word as politics has no meaning in religion.

In Islamic sculpture and sanctified concepts the most pious remains the most courageous and signified hence an emblem of governance.

Islam actually does not own the term politics in her domain but rather it floats a rationalize way of dictation and administration that itself controls the basic as of political slogans.

However this interpretation of Islam to consider and tag politics and Islam similar and same within the contextual application of practice; has altogether been disown hence negated thereby separating it from today’s politics.

Actually we must understand the after effects of this religion based politics.

 Such politics and political slogans are the mixture of necessity based authoritative self made shariah; you may call interpreted thought as Fatwa’s; that has nothing to do with actual methodology of Islam.

It is due to this fact that variant believers other than what is governing the sate in terms of political occupancy; retaliates and shake the momentary decisions of authority thus challenging the theme and theory hence hullabaloo  the conflict as order or fatwa.

After shocks of such hubbubs figure and feature the image of the postulate as fatwa; in terms of controversy; among variant settlers with in the flag and in global spectrum.

In any case; conflicts the air with dusty image of Islam and its administrative faculties as governance.

One more issue that distort the peculiar image of Islam by these religion based political goons; is their selectivity to preach what is beneficial to the theme of their reign whereas to mummify what is or may not provide incentive and support to their tenure as time.

Actually majority in Islam as Muslim are dependent on reserved comments in preponderance to what their religious scholars dictates and interpret as Fatwa’s; thus keeps Islam in sanctified asylum and practices under grilled conceits as dictated and interpreted accordingly  and by them.

This is one more addition that supports these political goons and morbid scholars in politics to cash their nuisance as legitimate owner of Islam, Muslims and shariah.

In fact they squeeze their decision within the safe parameter of interpretation therefore to nut the shell within the pool of follower as compulsion.

In my opinion Islamic principality in whatsoever contest may it be; a politics, social, benevolent or jurisprudence have same and similar port that takes its platform from legitimated factual declarations as commandments in terms of Quran; thus keeping basics as facts, obligatory as essential and necessity as interpretation as per rule of basics and according to secluded sculled desire as sects. 

This decision clearly exemplify that this sanctified port of Islam is being or was being utilized by ravishers before that and is a threat of time as yet; thus to derail and derange conceptual autonomy of human as non practitioner and Muslims as practitioner and follower.